Journal Forum

Synthetic Reverberator - January 1960
1 comment

Multichannel Sound Reproduction Quality Improves with Angular Separation of Direct and Reflected Sounds - June 2015
1 comment

Clean Audio for TV broadcast: An Object-Based Approach for Hearing-Impaired Viewers - April 2015

Access Journal Forum

Journal of the AES

2011 October - Volume 59 Number 10

Download Entire Issue (22.0MB) Listen to Podcast


Classification of Time–Frequency Regions in Stereo Audio


Algorithms that manipulate, remix, or transform stereo audio signals to suit the format of sound reproduction systems make assumptions about the way in which the stereo signal was originally mixed. However, these algorithms usually do not test if the assumptions are valid. In order to determine the type of mixing used in a stereo mix, this research compares two blind classification algorithms that divide individual time–frequency regions into six classes of mixing types. The results show that mixing strategies vary with the musical genre, and the classification algorithm can reduce the instability and center disintegration when upmixing a stereo signal to a multichannel format.

PDF (High Res) (3.9MB) PDF (Low Res) (559KB) Be the first to discuss this paper

Reproducing Sound Fields Using MIMO Acoustic Channel Inversion


There are many ways to reproduce a sound field over a wide spatial area using an array of loudspeakers, as for example, wavefield synthesis (WFS), ambisonics, and spectral division methods. A new approach, called sound field reconstruction (SFR), optimally reproduces a desired sound field in a given listening area while keeping loudspeaker driver signals within physical constraints. The reproduction of a continuous sound field is represented as an inversion of the discrete acoustic channel from a loudspeaker array to a grid of control points. Extensive simulations comparing WFS, which is the state of the art, with SFR show that on average SFR provides better reproduction accuracy.

PDF (High Res) (13.0MB) PDF (Low Res) (1004KB) Discuss this paper (2 comments)

Sound Source Signal Parameters in Vehicles for Determining Speech Transmission Index


In the acoustically complex environment of an automobile, speech communications among the vehicle occupants varies from unintelligible to excellent depending on their location, vehicle speed, and vocal effort. Because of its strong correlation with subjective tests, the speech transmission index (STI) was used to explore the influence of sound source parameters on in-vehicle intelligibility. For example, STI scores were higher when there was a direct path from the talker to the listener; scores were much lower when the talker was in front of the listener; and scores were lower for the outboard ear because of road noise.

PDF (High Res) (11.8MB) PDF (Low Res) (2.2MB) Be the first to discuss this paper

Engineering Reports

A Note on Mathematical Modeling of Power Amplifier/Loudspeaker Nonlinearity in Acoustic Echo Cancelers


A simple mathematical model is proposed to represent the nonlinear characteristics of the combined power amplifier and loudspeaker in acoustic echo cancellers. Three adjustable parameters of the model relate to the distinct parts of the nonlinearity: the linear region for small amplitude, the onset elbow where the nonlinearity begins, and the saturation region for large amplitudes. Compared to a piece-wise linear model, this approach has continuous first derivatives. In combination with linear adaptive filters, this model allows for the efficient design of echo cancellers.

PDF (High Res) (808KB) PDF (Low Res) (407KB) Be the first to discuss this report

Standards and Information Documents

AES Standards Committee News

Page: Download:PDF (429KB)

Core metadata; audio object metadata; high-resolution multichannel audio interconnection (HRMAI)


42nd Conference Report, Ilmenau

Page: Download:PDF (5.1MB)

Hear, Hear! Psychoacoustics and Subjective Evaluation


The field of psychoacoustics covers a multitude of topics concerned with human perception of sound. There is a “hard” or classical branch that deals in threshold detection, masking, loudness, and other low-level phenomena; then there is a “softer” branch that deals with the higher-level cognitive aspects of sound perception, including the ways in which we describe and evaluate aspects of sound quality. The classical branch typically employs relatively simple, laboratory-controlled test stimuli such as tones, clicks, and noises in order to find out fundamental things about the hearing process. The sound quality branch tends to be more interested in ecological signals such as music, speech, and environmental sounds. These are harder to control and make consistent, but they offer the possibility of finding out about the way we behave toward sound in richer, “real world” situations.

PDF (1.3MB) Be the first to discuss this feature

New Officers 2011/2012

Page: Download:PDF (113KB)

Review of Society’s Sustaining Members

Page: Download:PDF (168KB)

132nd Call for Papers, Budapest

Page: Download:PDF (67KB)

46th Call for Papers, Denver

Page: Download:PDF (93KB)

47th Call for Papers, Chicago

Page: Download:PDF (66KB)


Section News Page: PDF (3.4MB)

Products and Developments Page: PDF (86KB)

Sound Track Page: PDF (122KB)

Membership Information Page: PDF (35KB)

Section Contacts Directory Page: PDF (83KB)

Advertiser Internet Directory Page: PDF (42KB)

AES Conventions and Conferences Page: PDF (102KB)


Table of Contents PDF (26KB)

Cover & Sustaining Members List PDF (89KB)

AES Officers, Committees, Offices & Journal Staff PDF (86KB)

Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   Google+   YouTube   RSS News Feeds  
AES - Audio Engineering Society