The Audibility of Typical Digital Audio Filters in a High-Fidelity Playback System
×
Cite This
Citation & Abstract
HE. M.. Jackson, MI. D.. Capp, and J.. RO. Stuart, "The Audibility of Typical Digital Audio Filters in a High-Fidelity Playback System," Paper 9174, (2014 October.). doi:
HE. M.. Jackson, MI. D.. Capp, and J.. RO. Stuart, "The Audibility of Typical Digital Audio Filters in a High-Fidelity Playback System," Paper 9174, (2014 October.). doi:
Abstract: This paper describes listening tests investigating the audibility of various filters applied in high-resolution wideband digital playback systems. Discrimination between filtered and unfiltered signals was compared directly in the same subjects using a double-blind psychophysical test. Filter responses tested were representative of anti-alias filters used in A/D (analog-to-digital) converters or mastering processes. Further tests probed the audibility of 16-bit quantization with or without a rectangular dither. Results suggest that listeners are sensitive to the small signal alterations introduced by these filters and quantization. Two main conclusions are offered: first, there exist audible signals that cannot be encoded transparently by a standard CD; and second, an audio chain used for such experiments must be capable of high-fidelity reproduction.
@article{jackson2014the,
author={jackson, helen m. and capp, michael d. and stuart, j. robert},
journal={journal of the audio engineering society},
title={the audibility of typical digital audio filters in a high-fidelity playback system},
year={2014},
volume={},
number={},
pages={},
doi={},
month={october},}
@article{jackson2014the,
author={jackson, helen m. and capp, michael d. and stuart, j. robert},
journal={journal of the audio engineering society},
title={the audibility of typical digital audio filters in a high-fidelity playback system},
year={2014},
volume={},
number={},
pages={},
doi={},
month={october},
abstract={this paper describes listening tests investigating the audibility of various filters applied in high-resolution wideband digital playback systems. discrimination between filtered and unfiltered signals was compared directly in the same subjects using a double-blind psychophysical test. filter responses tested were representative of anti-alias filters used in a/d (analog-to-digital) converters or mastering processes. further tests probed the audibility of 16-bit quantization with or without a rectangular dither. results suggest that listeners are sensitive to the small signal alterations introduced by these filters and quantization. two main conclusions are offered: first, there exist audible signals that cannot be encoded transparently by a standard cd; and second, an audio chain used for such experiments must be capable of high-fidelity reproduction.},}
TY - paper
TI - The Audibility of Typical Digital Audio Filters in a High-Fidelity Playback System
SP -
EP -
AU - Jackson, Helen M.
AU - Capp, Michael D.
AU - Stuart, J. Robert
PY - 2014
JO - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
IS -
VO -
VL -
Y1 - October 2014
TY - paper
TI - The Audibility of Typical Digital Audio Filters in a High-Fidelity Playback System
SP -
EP -
AU - Jackson, Helen M.
AU - Capp, Michael D.
AU - Stuart, J. Robert
PY - 2014
JO - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
IS -
VO -
VL -
Y1 - October 2014
AB - This paper describes listening tests investigating the audibility of various filters applied in high-resolution wideband digital playback systems. Discrimination between filtered and unfiltered signals was compared directly in the same subjects using a double-blind psychophysical test. Filter responses tested were representative of anti-alias filters used in A/D (analog-to-digital) converters or mastering processes. Further tests probed the audibility of 16-bit quantization with or without a rectangular dither. Results suggest that listeners are sensitive to the small signal alterations introduced by these filters and quantization. Two main conclusions are offered: first, there exist audible signals that cannot be encoded transparently by a standard CD; and second, an audio chain used for such experiments must be capable of high-fidelity reproduction.
This paper describes listening tests investigating the audibility of various filters applied in high-resolution wideband digital playback systems. Discrimination between filtered and unfiltered signals was compared directly in the same subjects using a double-blind psychophysical test. Filter responses tested were representative of anti-alias filters used in A/D (analog-to-digital) converters or mastering processes. Further tests probed the audibility of 16-bit quantization with or without a rectangular dither. Results suggest that listeners are sensitive to the small signal alterations introduced by these filters and quantization. Two main conclusions are offered: first, there exist audible signals that cannot be encoded transparently by a standard CD; and second, an audio chain used for such experiments must be capable of high-fidelity reproduction.
Authors:
Jackson, Helen M.; Capp, Michael D.; Stuart, J. Robert
Affiliation:
Meridian Audio Ltd., Huntingdon, UK
AES Convention:
137 (October 2014)
Paper Number:
9174
Publication Date:
October 8, 2014Import into BibTeX
Subject:
Perception
Permalink:
http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=17497