Direct Comparison of the Impact of Head Tracking, Reverberation, and Individualized Head-Related Transfer Functions on the Spatial Perception of a Virtual Speech Source
×
Cite This
Citation & Abstract
DU. R.. Begault, AL. S.. Lee, EL. M.. Wenzel, and MA. R.. Anderson, "Direct Comparison of the Impact of Head Tracking, Reverberation, and Individualized Head-Related Transfer Functions on the Spatial Perception of a Virtual Speech Source," Paper 5134, (2000 February.). doi:
DU. R.. Begault, AL. S.. Lee, EL. M.. Wenzel, and MA. R.. Anderson, "Direct Comparison of the Impact of Head Tracking, Reverberation, and Individualized Head-Related Transfer Functions on the Spatial Perception of a Virtual Speech Source," Paper 5134, (2000 February.). doi:
Abstract: A study was performed using headphone-delivered virtual speech stimuli, rendered via HRTF-based acoustic auralization software and hardware as well as blocked-meatus HRTF measurements. The independent variables were chosen to evaluate commonly held assumptions in the literature regarding improved localization: inclusion of head tracking, individualized HRTFs, and early and diffuse reflections. Significant differences were found for azimuth/elevation error, reversal rates, and externalization.:
@article{begault2000direct,
author={begault, durand r. and lee, alexandra s. and wenzel, elizabeth m. and anderson, mark r.},
journal={journal of the audio engineering society},
title={direct comparison of the impact of head tracking, reverberation, and individualized head-related transfer functions on the spatial perception of a virtual speech source},
year={2000},
volume={},
number={},
pages={},
doi={},
month={february},}
@article{begault2000direct,
author={begault, durand r. and lee, alexandra s. and wenzel, elizabeth m. and anderson, mark r.},
journal={journal of the audio engineering society},
title={direct comparison of the impact of head tracking, reverberation, and individualized head-related transfer functions on the spatial perception of a virtual speech source},
year={2000},
volume={},
number={},
pages={},
doi={},
month={february},
abstract={a study was performed using headphone-delivered virtual speech stimuli, rendered via hrtf-based acoustic auralization software and hardware as well as blocked-meatus hrtf measurements. the independent variables were chosen to evaluate commonly held assumptions in the literature regarding improved localization: inclusion of head tracking, individualized hrtfs, and early and diffuse reflections. significant differences were found for azimuth/elevation error, reversal rates, and externalization.: },}
TY - paper
TI - Direct Comparison of the Impact of Head Tracking, Reverberation, and Individualized Head-Related Transfer Functions on the Spatial Perception of a Virtual Speech Source
SP -
EP -
AU - Begault, Durand R.
AU - Lee, Alexandra S.
AU - Wenzel, Elizabeth M.
AU - Anderson, Mark R.
PY - 2000
JO - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
IS -
VO -
VL -
Y1 - February 2000
TY - paper
TI - Direct Comparison of the Impact of Head Tracking, Reverberation, and Individualized Head-Related Transfer Functions on the Spatial Perception of a Virtual Speech Source
SP -
EP -
AU - Begault, Durand R.
AU - Lee, Alexandra S.
AU - Wenzel, Elizabeth M.
AU - Anderson, Mark R.
PY - 2000
JO - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
IS -
VO -
VL -
Y1 - February 2000
AB - A study was performed using headphone-delivered virtual speech stimuli, rendered via HRTF-based acoustic auralization software and hardware as well as blocked-meatus HRTF measurements. The independent variables were chosen to evaluate commonly held assumptions in the literature regarding improved localization: inclusion of head tracking, individualized HRTFs, and early and diffuse reflections. Significant differences were found for azimuth/elevation error, reversal rates, and externalization.:
A study was performed using headphone-delivered virtual speech stimuli, rendered via HRTF-based acoustic auralization software and hardware as well as blocked-meatus HRTF measurements. The independent variables were chosen to evaluate commonly held assumptions in the literature regarding improved localization: inclusion of head tracking, individualized HRTFs, and early and diffuse reflections. Significant differences were found for azimuth/elevation error, reversal rates, and externalization.:
Authors:
Begault, Durand R.; Lee, Alexandra S.; Wenzel, Elizabeth M.; Anderson, Mark R.
Affiliations:
San Jose State University, San Jose, CA ; NASA Ames Research Center, USA ; Raytheon STX Corporation, USA(See document for exact affiliation information.)
AES Convention:
108 (February 2000)
Paper Number:
5134
Publication Date:
February 1, 2000Import into BibTeX
Subject:
Psychoacoustics
Permalink:
http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=9204