The Detection Thresholds of Resonances at Low Frequencies
×
Cite This
Citation & Abstract
SE. E.. Olive, PE. L.. Schuck, JA. G.. Ryan, SH. L.. Sally, and MA. E.. Bonneville, "The Detection Thresholds of Resonances at Low Frequencies," J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 116-128, (1997 March.). doi:
SE. E.. Olive, PE. L.. Schuck, JA. G.. Ryan, SH. L.. Sally, and MA. E.. Bonneville, "The Detection Thresholds of Resonances at Low Frequencies," J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 45 Issue 3 pp. 116-128, (1997 March.). doi:
Abstract: New experimental data on the detection thresholds of low-frequency resonances and antiresonances are presented. Using an adaptive procedure known as the up-down transformed response (UDTR) rule, the 70.7% detection thresholds were measured for a single added resonance (peak and notch) for different Q values and center frequencies. The signals included pink noise and pulses auditioned through earphones. The results show that detection thresholds are affected in complicated ways by Q, center frequency, and signal type. This makes their detection difficult to predict using current hearing models and frequency response measurements.
@article{olive1997the,
author={olive, sean e. and schuck, peter l. and ryan, james g. and sally, sharon l. and bonneville, marc e.},
journal={journal of the audio engineering society},
title={the detection thresholds of resonances at low frequencies},
year={1997},
volume={45},
number={3},
pages={116-128},
doi={},
month={march},}
@article{olive1997the,
author={olive, sean e. and schuck, peter l. and ryan, james g. and sally, sharon l. and bonneville, marc e.},
journal={journal of the audio engineering society},
title={the detection thresholds of resonances at low frequencies},
year={1997},
volume={45},
number={3},
pages={116-128},
doi={},
month={march},
abstract={new experimental data on the detection thresholds of low-frequency resonances and antiresonances are presented. using an adaptive procedure known as the up-down transformed response (udtr) rule, the 70.7% detection thresholds were measured for a single added resonance (peak and notch) for different q values and center frequencies. the signals included pink noise and pulses auditioned through earphones. the results show that detection thresholds are affected in complicated ways by q, center frequency, and signal type. this makes their detection difficult to predict using current hearing models and frequency response measurements.},}
TY - paper
TI - The Detection Thresholds of Resonances at Low Frequencies
SP - 116
EP - 128
AU - Olive, Sean E.
AU - Schuck, Peter L.
AU - Ryan, James G.
AU - Sally, Sharon L.
AU - Bonneville, Marc E.
PY - 1997
JO - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
IS - 3
VO - 45
VL - 45
Y1 - March 1997
TY - paper
TI - The Detection Thresholds of Resonances at Low Frequencies
SP - 116
EP - 128
AU - Olive, Sean E.
AU - Schuck, Peter L.
AU - Ryan, James G.
AU - Sally, Sharon L.
AU - Bonneville, Marc E.
PY - 1997
JO - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
IS - 3
VO - 45
VL - 45
Y1 - March 1997
AB - New experimental data on the detection thresholds of low-frequency resonances and antiresonances are presented. Using an adaptive procedure known as the up-down transformed response (UDTR) rule, the 70.7% detection thresholds were measured for a single added resonance (peak and notch) for different Q values and center frequencies. The signals included pink noise and pulses auditioned through earphones. The results show that detection thresholds are affected in complicated ways by Q, center frequency, and signal type. This makes their detection difficult to predict using current hearing models and frequency response measurements.
New experimental data on the detection thresholds of low-frequency resonances and antiresonances are presented. Using an adaptive procedure known as the up-down transformed response (UDTR) rule, the 70.7% detection thresholds were measured for a single added resonance (peak and notch) for different Q values and center frequencies. The signals included pink noise and pulses auditioned through earphones. The results show that detection thresholds are affected in complicated ways by Q, center frequency, and signal type. This makes their detection difficult to predict using current hearing models and frequency response measurements.
Authors:
Olive, Sean E.; Schuck, Peter L.; Ryan, James G.; Sally, Sharon L.; Bonneville, Marc E.
Affiliations:
Acoustics and Signal Processing, Institute for Microstructural Sciences, National Research Council, Ottawa; Ont., Canada ; Canadian Audio Research Consortium, Audio Products International Ltd., Scarborough, Ont., Canada(See document for exact affiliation information.) JAES Volume 45 Issue 3 pp. 116-128; March 1997
Publication Date:
March 1, 1997Import into BibTeX
Permalink:
http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=7868