Overview of Evaluation Methods of Sound Field Reproduction Systems
×
Cite This
Citation & Abstract
J. Banas, M. Grzywa, R. Jezierski, P. Klinke, D. Koszewski, M. Kuklinowski, P. Maziewski, P. Pach, D. Stanczak, and P. Trella, "Overview of Evaluation Methods of Sound Field Reproduction Systems," Engineering Brief 671, (2022 May.). doi:
J. Banas, M. Grzywa, R. Jezierski, P. Klinke, D. Koszewski, M. Kuklinowski, P. Maziewski, P. Pach, D. Stanczak, and P. Trella, "Overview of Evaluation Methods of Sound Field Reproduction Systems," Engineering Brief 671, (2022 May.). doi:
Abstract: Sound reproduction is a task where the goal is to accurately reproduce sound field of a previously captured audio scene in a defined controlled receiving space. According to the current state-of-the-art technology there is no system available which can perform such task perfectly. Unrestricted reproduction of a three-dimensional sound field would require a spatially continuous sound source, therefore any real sound field reproduction system, consisting of discrete sound sources, offers only an approximation of the original sound field. Each system can be objectively evaluated against various aspects of sound field reproduction accuracy like spectral and level matching, quality and distortions, time, and directivity cues, "sweet spot" size, the influence of obstacles in the receiving
space (like equipment or people) or using perceptual objective metrics. The goal of this work is to compile these evaluation methods and provide mapping to the abovementioned key aspects of sound field reproduction. The authors contextualize the overview in the acoustic testing perspective, where specific aspects of a sound reproduction accuracy matter in evaluation of different audio-related feature of a device (e.g., for testing quality of Direction of Arrival – directivity ques are critical for evaluation, whereas for testing Acoustical Scene Classification – spectral and level accuracy is more relevant) but the evaluation methods and findings can be translated into other areas of audio research.
@article{banas2022overview,
author={banas, jan and grzywa, michal and jezierski, ryszard and klinke, piotr and koszewski, damian and kuklinowski, maciej and maziewski, przemyslaw and pach, pawel and stanczak, dominik and trella, pawel},
journal={journal of the audio engineering society},
title={overview of evaluation methods of sound field reproduction systems},
year={2022},
volume={},
number={},
pages={},
doi={},
month={may},}
@article{banas2022overview,
author={banas, jan and grzywa, michal and jezierski, ryszard and klinke, piotr and koszewski, damian and kuklinowski, maciej and maziewski, przemyslaw and pach, pawel and stanczak, dominik and trella, pawel},
journal={journal of the audio engineering society},
title={overview of evaluation methods of sound field reproduction systems},
year={2022},
volume={},
number={},
pages={},
doi={},
month={may},
abstract={sound reproduction is a task where the goal is to accurately reproduce sound field of a previously captured audio scene in a defined controlled receiving space. according to the current state-of-the-art technology there is no system available which can perform such task perfectly. unrestricted reproduction of a three-dimensional sound field would require a spatially continuous sound source, therefore any real sound field reproduction system, consisting of discrete sound sources, offers only an approximation of the original sound field. each system can be objectively evaluated against various aspects of sound field reproduction accuracy like spectral and level matching, quality and distortions, time, and directivity cues, "sweet spot" size, the influence of obstacles in the receiving
space (like equipment or people) or using perceptual objective metrics. the goal of this work is to compile these evaluation methods and provide mapping to the abovementioned key aspects of sound field reproduction. the authors contextualize the overview in the acoustic testing perspective, where specific aspects of a sound reproduction accuracy matter in evaluation of different audio-related feature of a device (e.g., for testing quality of direction of arrival – directivity ques are critical for evaluation, whereas for testing acoustical scene classification – spectral and level accuracy is more relevant) but the evaluation methods and findings can be translated into other areas of audio research.},}
TY - paper
TI - Overview of Evaluation Methods of Sound Field Reproduction Systems
SP -
EP -
AU - Banas, Jan
AU - Grzywa, Michal
AU - Jezierski, Ryszard
AU - Klinke, Piotr
AU - Koszewski, Damian
AU - Kuklinowski, Maciej
AU - Maziewski, Przemyslaw
AU - Pach, Pawel
AU - Stanczak, Dominik
AU - Trella, Pawel
PY - 2022
JO - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
IS -
VO -
VL -
Y1 - May 2022
TY - paper
TI - Overview of Evaluation Methods of Sound Field Reproduction Systems
SP -
EP -
AU - Banas, Jan
AU - Grzywa, Michal
AU - Jezierski, Ryszard
AU - Klinke, Piotr
AU - Koszewski, Damian
AU - Kuklinowski, Maciej
AU - Maziewski, Przemyslaw
AU - Pach, Pawel
AU - Stanczak, Dominik
AU - Trella, Pawel
PY - 2022
JO - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
IS -
VO -
VL -
Y1 - May 2022
AB - Sound reproduction is a task where the goal is to accurately reproduce sound field of a previously captured audio scene in a defined controlled receiving space. According to the current state-of-the-art technology there is no system available which can perform such task perfectly. Unrestricted reproduction of a three-dimensional sound field would require a spatially continuous sound source, therefore any real sound field reproduction system, consisting of discrete sound sources, offers only an approximation of the original sound field. Each system can be objectively evaluated against various aspects of sound field reproduction accuracy like spectral and level matching, quality and distortions, time, and directivity cues, "sweet spot" size, the influence of obstacles in the receiving
space (like equipment or people) or using perceptual objective metrics. The goal of this work is to compile these evaluation methods and provide mapping to the abovementioned key aspects of sound field reproduction. The authors contextualize the overview in the acoustic testing perspective, where specific aspects of a sound reproduction accuracy matter in evaluation of different audio-related feature of a device (e.g., for testing quality of Direction of Arrival – directivity ques are critical for evaluation, whereas for testing Acoustical Scene Classification – spectral and level accuracy is more relevant) but the evaluation methods and findings can be translated into other areas of audio research.
Sound reproduction is a task where the goal is to accurately reproduce sound field of a previously captured audio scene in a defined controlled receiving space. According to the current state-of-the-art technology there is no system available which can perform such task perfectly. Unrestricted reproduction of a three-dimensional sound field would require a spatially continuous sound source, therefore any real sound field reproduction system, consisting of discrete sound sources, offers only an approximation of the original sound field. Each system can be objectively evaluated against various aspects of sound field reproduction accuracy like spectral and level matching, quality and distortions, time, and directivity cues, "sweet spot" size, the influence of obstacles in the receiving
space (like equipment or people) or using perceptual objective metrics. The goal of this work is to compile these evaluation methods and provide mapping to the abovementioned key aspects of sound field reproduction. The authors contextualize the overview in the acoustic testing perspective, where specific aspects of a sound reproduction accuracy matter in evaluation of different audio-related feature of a device (e.g., for testing quality of Direction of Arrival – directivity ques are critical for evaluation, whereas for testing Acoustical Scene Classification – spectral and level accuracy is more relevant) but the evaluation methods and findings can be translated into other areas of audio research.
The Engineering Briefs at this Convention were
selected on the basis of a submitted synopsis,
ensuring that they are of interest to AES members,
and are not overly commercial. These briefs have
been reproduced from the authors' advance
manuscripts, without editing, corrections, or
consideration by the Review Board. The AES takes no
responsibility for their contents. Paper copies are
not available, but any member can freely access
these briefs. Members are encouraged to provide
comments that enhance their usefulness.