Technological advances have enabled new approaches to broadcast audio accessibility, leveraging metadata generated in production and machine learning to improve blind source separation (BSS). This work presents two contributions to accessibility knowledge: first, a quantitative comparison of two audio accessibility methods, Narrative Importance (NI) and Dolby AC-4 BSS. Secondly, an evaluation of the audio access needs of neurodivergent audiences. The paper presents two comparative studies. The first study shows that the AC-4 BSS and NI methods are ranked consistently higher for clarity of dialogue (compared to the original mix) whilst improving, or retaining, perceived quality. A second study quantifies the effect of these methods on word recognition, quality and listening effort for a cohort including normal hearing, d/Deaf, hard of hearing and neurodivergent individuals, with NI showing a significant improvement in all metrics. Surveys of participants indicated some overlap between Neurodivergent and d/Deaf and hard of hearing participants’ access needs, with similar levels of subtitle usage in both groups.

Authors: McClenaghan, Iain; Pardoe, Lawrence; Ward, Lauren
Affiliations: BBC R&D, London, UK; University of York, York, UK(See document for exact affiliation information.)
AES Convention: 152 (May 2022) Paper Number: 10598
Publication Date: May 2, 2022 Import into BibTeX
Subject: Sound Quality & Perception
Permalink: https://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=21711

Download Now (674 KB)

This paper is Open Access which means you can download it for free.

Learn more about the AES E-Library

E-Library Location:   /conv/152/10598.pdf

Start a discussion about this paper!