AES E-Library

I. Dash, and M. Bowry, "Radio Studio Acoustics Part 1: Subjective Evaluation," Paper 9256, (2015 May.). doi: I. Dash, and M. Bowry, "Radio Studio Acoustics Part 1: Subjective Evaluation," Paper 9256, (2015 May.). doi:
Abstract: A subjective evaluation exercise to determine the perceived acoustical quality of 12 small acoustic spaces used for radio production and presentation was conducted using two recording methods. One set of recordings used multiple microphones and the other set used a single microphone. A common listening test was run using both sets of recordings. The novel approach using multiple microphones was found to be a more sensitive and reliable method, and leads to different conclusions on acoustic performance criteria compared with a more conventional assessment. Group differences due to the reader, listener gender, listener location, and listener skill level were performed using ANOVA.

@article{dash2015radio,
author={dash, ian and bowry, mark},
journal={journal of the audio engineering society},
title={radio studio acoustics part 1: subjective evaluation},
year={2015},
volume={},
number={},
pages={},
doi={},
month={may},} @article{dash2015radio,
author={dash, ian and bowry, mark},
journal={journal of the audio engineering society},
title={radio studio acoustics part 1: subjective evaluation},
year={2015},
volume={},
number={},
pages={},
doi={},
month={may},
abstract={a subjective evaluation exercise to determine the perceived acoustical quality of 12 small acoustic spaces used for radio production and presentation was conducted using two recording methods. one set of recordings used multiple microphones and the other set used a single microphone. a common listening test was run using both sets of recordings. the novel approach using multiple microphones was found to be a more sensitive and reliable method, and leads to different conclusions on acoustic performance criteria compared with a more conventional assessment. group differences due to the reader, listener gender, listener location, and listener skill level were performed using anova.},}

TY - paper
TI - Radio Studio Acoustics Part 1: Subjective Evaluation
SP - EP -
AU - Dash, Ian
AU - Bowry, Mark
PY - 2015
JO - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
IS -
VO -
VL -
Y1 - May 2015 TY - paper
TI - Radio Studio Acoustics Part 1: Subjective Evaluation
SP - EP -
AU - Dash, Ian
AU - Bowry, Mark
PY - 2015
JO - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
IS -
VO -
VL -
Y1 - May 2015
AB - A subjective evaluation exercise to determine the perceived acoustical quality of 12 small acoustic spaces used for radio production and presentation was conducted using two recording methods. One set of recordings used multiple microphones and the other set used a single microphone. A common listening test was run using both sets of recordings. The novel approach using multiple microphones was found to be a more sensitive and reliable method, and leads to different conclusions on acoustic performance criteria compared with a more conventional assessment. Group differences due to the reader, listener gender, listener location, and listener skill level were performed using ANOVA.