J. Allan, and J. Berg, "Evaluation Criteria for Live Loudness Meters," Paper 9175, (2014 October.). doi:
J. Allan, and J. Berg, "Evaluation Criteria for Live Loudness Meters," Paper 9175, (2014 October.). doi:
Abstract: As a response to discrepancies in loudness levels in broadcast, the recommendations of the International Telecommunication Union and the European Broadcasting Union state that audio levels should be regulated based on loudness measurement. These recommendations differ regarding the definition of meter ballistics for live loudness meters, and this paper seeks to identify possible additional information needed to attain a higher conformity between the recommendations. This work suggests that the qualities we seek in a live loudness meter could be more differentiated for different time scales (i.e., momentary and short-term that is defined by two different integration times), and therefore also should be evaluated by different evaluation criteria.
@article{allan2014evaluation,
author={allan, jon and berg, jan},
journal={journal of the audio engineering society},
title={evaluation criteria for live loudness meters},
year={2014},
volume={},
number={},
pages={},
doi={},
month={october},}
@article{allan2014evaluation,
author={allan, jon and berg, jan},
journal={journal of the audio engineering society},
title={evaluation criteria for live loudness meters},
year={2014},
volume={},
number={},
pages={},
doi={},
month={october},
abstract={as a response to discrepancies in loudness levels in broadcast, the recommendations of the international telecommunication union and the european broadcasting union state that audio levels should be regulated based on loudness measurement. these recommendations differ regarding the definition of meter ballistics for live loudness meters, and this paper seeks to identify possible additional information needed to attain a higher conformity between the recommendations. this work suggests that the qualities we seek in a live loudness meter could be more differentiated for different time scales (i.e., momentary and short-term that is defined by two different integration times), and therefore also should be evaluated by different evaluation criteria.},}
TY - paper
TI - Evaluation Criteria for Live Loudness Meters
SP -
EP -
AU - Allan, Jon
AU - Berg, Jan
PY - 2014
JO - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
IS -
VO -
VL -
Y1 - October 2014
TY - paper
TI - Evaluation Criteria for Live Loudness Meters
SP -
EP -
AU - Allan, Jon
AU - Berg, Jan
PY - 2014
JO - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
IS -
VO -
VL -
Y1 - October 2014
AB - As a response to discrepancies in loudness levels in broadcast, the recommendations of the International Telecommunication Union and the European Broadcasting Union state that audio levels should be regulated based on loudness measurement. These recommendations differ regarding the definition of meter ballistics for live loudness meters, and this paper seeks to identify possible additional information needed to attain a higher conformity between the recommendations. This work suggests that the qualities we seek in a live loudness meter could be more differentiated for different time scales (i.e., momentary and short-term that is defined by two different integration times), and therefore also should be evaluated by different evaluation criteria.
As a response to discrepancies in loudness levels in broadcast, the recommendations of the International Telecommunication Union and the European Broadcasting Union state that audio levels should be regulated based on loudness measurement. These recommendations differ regarding the definition of meter ballistics for live loudness meters, and this paper seeks to identify possible additional information needed to attain a higher conformity between the recommendations. This work suggests that the qualities we seek in a live loudness meter could be more differentiated for different time scales (i.e., momentary and short-term that is defined by two different integration times), and therefore also should be evaluated by different evaluation criteria.
Authors:
Allan, Jon; Berg, Jan
Affiliation:
LuleƄ University of Technology, PiteƄ, Sweden
AES Convention:
137 (October 2014)
Paper Number:
9175
Publication Date:
October 8, 2014Import into BibTeX
Subject:
Perception
Permalink:
http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=17498