The Acceptability of Speech with Interfering Radio Program Material
×
Cite This
Citation & Abstract
K. Baykaner, C. Hummersone, R. Mason, and S. Bech, "The Acceptability of Speech with Interfering Radio Program Material," Paper 9020, (2014 April.). doi:
K. Baykaner, C. Hummersone, R. Mason, and S. Bech, "The Acceptability of Speech with Interfering Radio Program Material," Paper 9020, (2014 April.). doi:
Abstract: A listening test was conducted to investigate the acceptability of audio-on-audio interference for radio programs featuring speech as the target. Twenty-one subjects, including naïve and expert listeners, were presented with 200 randomly assigned pairs of stimuli and asked to report, for each trial, whether the listening scenario was acceptable or unacceptable. Stimuli pairs were set to randomly selected SNRs ranging from 0 to 45 dB. Results showed no significant difference between subjects according to listening experience. A logistic regression to acceptability was carried out based on SNR. The model had accuracy R2 = 0.87, RMSE = 14%, and RMSE* = 7%. By accounting for the presence of background audio in the target program, 90% of the variance could be explained.
@article{baykaner2014the,
author={baykaner, khan and hummersone, christopher and mason, russell and bech, søren},
journal={journal of the audio engineering society},
title={the acceptability of speech with interfering radio program material},
year={2014},
volume={},
number={},
pages={},
doi={},
month={april},}
@article{baykaner2014the,
author={baykaner, khan and hummersone, christopher and mason, russell and bech, søren},
journal={journal of the audio engineering society},
title={the acceptability of speech with interfering radio program material},
year={2014},
volume={},
number={},
pages={},
doi={},
month={april},
abstract={a listening test was conducted to investigate the acceptability of audio-on-audio interference for radio programs featuring speech as the target. twenty-one subjects, including naïve and expert listeners, were presented with 200 randomly assigned pairs of stimuli and asked to report, for each trial, whether the listening scenario was acceptable or unacceptable. stimuli pairs were set to randomly selected snrs ranging from 0 to 45 db. results showed no significant difference between subjects according to listening experience. a logistic regression to acceptability was carried out based on snr. the model had accuracy r2 = 0.87, rmse = 14%, and rmse* = 7%. by accounting for the presence of background audio in the target program, 90% of the variance could be explained.},}
TY - paper
TI - The Acceptability of Speech with Interfering Radio Program Material
SP -
EP -
AU - Baykaner, Khan
AU - Hummersone, Christopher
AU - Mason, Russell
AU - Bech, Søren
PY - 2014
JO - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
IS -
VO -
VL -
Y1 - April 2014
TY - paper
TI - The Acceptability of Speech with Interfering Radio Program Material
SP -
EP -
AU - Baykaner, Khan
AU - Hummersone, Christopher
AU - Mason, Russell
AU - Bech, Søren
PY - 2014
JO - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
IS -
VO -
VL -
Y1 - April 2014
AB - A listening test was conducted to investigate the acceptability of audio-on-audio interference for radio programs featuring speech as the target. Twenty-one subjects, including naïve and expert listeners, were presented with 200 randomly assigned pairs of stimuli and asked to report, for each trial, whether the listening scenario was acceptable or unacceptable. Stimuli pairs were set to randomly selected SNRs ranging from 0 to 45 dB. Results showed no significant difference between subjects according to listening experience. A logistic regression to acceptability was carried out based on SNR. The model had accuracy R2 = 0.87, RMSE = 14%, and RMSE* = 7%. By accounting for the presence of background audio in the target program, 90% of the variance could be explained.
A listening test was conducted to investigate the acceptability of audio-on-audio interference for radio programs featuring speech as the target. Twenty-one subjects, including naïve and expert listeners, were presented with 200 randomly assigned pairs of stimuli and asked to report, for each trial, whether the listening scenario was acceptable or unacceptable. Stimuli pairs were set to randomly selected SNRs ranging from 0 to 45 dB. Results showed no significant difference between subjects according to listening experience. A logistic regression to acceptability was carried out based on SNR. The model had accuracy R2 = 0.87, RMSE = 14%, and RMSE* = 7%. By accounting for the presence of background audio in the target program, 90% of the variance could be explained.
Authors:
Baykaner, Khan; Hummersone, Christopher; Mason, Russell; Bech, Søren
Affiliations:
University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK; Bang & Olufsen a/s, Struer, Denmark; Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark(See document for exact affiliation information.)
AES Convention:
136 (April 2014)
Paper Number:
9020
Publication Date:
April 25, 2014Import into BibTeX
Subject:
Perception
Permalink:
http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=17167