AES E-Library

D. Romblom, R. King, and C. Guastavino, "A Perceptual Evaluation of Recording, Rendering, and Reproduction Techniques for Multichannel Spatial Audio," Paper 9004, (2013 October.). doi: D. Romblom, R. King, and C. Guastavino, "A Perceptual Evaluation of Recording, Rendering, and Reproduction Techniques for Multichannel Spatial Audio," Paper 9004, (2013 October.). doi:
Abstract: The objective of this project is to perceptually evaluate the relative merits of two different spatial audio recording and rendering techniques within the context of two different multichannel reproduction systems. The two recordings and rendering techniques are "natural," using main microphone arrays, and "virtual," using spot microphones, panning, and simulated acoustic delay. The two reproduction systems are the 3/2 system (5.1 surround) and a 12/2 system, where the frontal L/C/R triplet is replaced by a 12-loudspeaker linear array. The perceptual attributes of multichannel spatial audio have been established by previous authors. In this study magnitude ratings of selected spatial audio attributes are presented for the above treatments and results are discussed.

@article{romblom2013a,
author={romblom, david and king, richard and guastavino, catherine},
journal={journal of the audio engineering society},
title={a perceptual evaluation of recording, rendering, and reproduction techniques for multichannel spatial audio},
year={2013},
volume={},
number={},
pages={},
doi={},
month={october},} @article{romblom2013a,
author={romblom, david and king, richard and guastavino, catherine},
journal={journal of the audio engineering society},
title={a perceptual evaluation of recording, rendering, and reproduction techniques for multichannel spatial audio},
year={2013},
volume={},
number={},
pages={},
doi={},
month={october},
abstract={the objective of this project is to perceptually evaluate the relative merits of two different spatial audio recording and rendering techniques within the context of two different multichannel reproduction systems. the two recordings and rendering techniques are "natural," using main microphone arrays, and "virtual," using spot microphones, panning, and simulated acoustic delay. the two reproduction systems are the 3/2 system (5.1 surround) and a 12/2 system, where the frontal l/c/r triplet is replaced by a 12-loudspeaker linear array. the perceptual attributes of multichannel spatial audio have been established by previous authors. in this study magnitude ratings of selected spatial audio attributes are presented for the above treatments and results are discussed.},}

TY - paper
TI - A Perceptual Evaluation of Recording, Rendering, and Reproduction Techniques for Multichannel Spatial Audio
SP - EP -
AU - Romblom, David
AU - King, Richard
AU - Guastavino, Catherine
PY - 2013
JO - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
IS -
VO -
VL -
Y1 - October 2013 TY - paper
TI - A Perceptual Evaluation of Recording, Rendering, and Reproduction Techniques for Multichannel Spatial Audio
SP - EP -
AU - Romblom, David
AU - King, Richard
AU - Guastavino, Catherine
PY - 2013
JO - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
IS -
VO -
VL -
Y1 - October 2013
AB - The objective of this project is to perceptually evaluate the relative merits of two different spatial audio recording and rendering techniques within the context of two different multichannel reproduction systems. The two recordings and rendering techniques are "natural," using main microphone arrays, and "virtual," using spot microphones, panning, and simulated acoustic delay. The two reproduction systems are the 3/2 system (5.1 surround) and a 12/2 system, where the frontal L/C/R triplet is replaced by a 12-loudspeaker linear array. The perceptual attributes of multichannel spatial audio have been established by previous authors. In this study magnitude ratings of selected spatial audio attributes are presented for the above treatments and results are discussed.