AES E-Library

J. Backman, "Numerical Simulation of Microphone Wind Noise, Part 1: External Flow," Paper 8866, (2013 May.). doi: J. Backman, "Numerical Simulation of Microphone Wind Noise, Part 1: External Flow," Paper 8866, (2013 May.). doi:
Abstract: This paper discusses the use of the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) for computational analysis of microphone wind noise. The first part of the work, presented in this paper, discusses the behavior of the flow around the microphone. One of the practical questions answered in this work is the well-known difference between “pop noise,” i.e., noise caused by transient flows, and wind noise generated by more stationary flows. It appears that boundary layer separation and related modification of flow field near the boundary is a significant factor in transient flow noise, while vortex shedding, emerging at higher flow velocities, is significant for steady state flow. The paper also discusses the effects of the geometrical shape and surface details on the wind noise.

@article{backman2013numerical,
author={backman, juha},
journal={journal of the audio engineering society},
title={numerical simulation of microphone wind noise, part 1: external flow},
year={2013},
volume={},
number={},
pages={},
doi={},
month={may},} @article{backman2013numerical,
author={backman, juha},
journal={journal of the audio engineering society},
title={numerical simulation of microphone wind noise, part 1: external flow},
year={2013},
volume={},
number={},
pages={},
doi={},
month={may},
abstract={this paper discusses the use of the computational fluid dynamics (cfd) for computational analysis of microphone wind noise. the first part of the work, presented in this paper, discusses the behavior of the flow around the microphone. one of the practical questions answered in this work is the well-known difference between “pop noise,” i.e., noise caused by transient flows, and wind noise generated by more stationary flows. it appears that boundary layer separation and related modification of flow field near the boundary is a significant factor in transient flow noise, while vortex shedding, emerging at higher flow velocities, is significant for steady state flow. the paper also discusses the effects of the geometrical shape and surface details on the wind noise.},}

TY - paper
TI - Numerical Simulation of Microphone Wind Noise, Part 1: External Flow
SP - EP -
AU - Backman, Juha
PY - 2013
JO - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
IS -
VO -
VL -
Y1 - May 2013 TY - paper
TI - Numerical Simulation of Microphone Wind Noise, Part 1: External Flow
SP - EP -
AU - Backman, Juha
PY - 2013
JO - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
IS -
VO -
VL -
Y1 - May 2013
AB - This paper discusses the use of the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) for computational analysis of microphone wind noise. The first part of the work, presented in this paper, discusses the behavior of the flow around the microphone. One of the practical questions answered in this work is the well-known difference between “pop noise,” i.e., noise caused by transient flows, and wind noise generated by more stationary flows. It appears that boundary layer separation and related modification of flow field near the boundary is a significant factor in transient flow noise, while vortex shedding, emerging at higher flow velocities, is significant for steady state flow. The paper also discusses the effects of the geometrical shape and surface details on the wind noise.