Comparative Analysis of Different Loudness Meters Based on Voice Detection and Gating
×
Cite This
Citation & Abstract
A. Travaglini, "Comparative Analysis of Different Loudness Meters Based on Voice Detection and Gating," Engineering Brief 86, (2013 May.). doi:
A. Travaglini, "Comparative Analysis of Different Loudness Meters Based on Voice Detection and Gating," Engineering Brief 86, (2013 May.). doi:
Abstract: After decades of extensive investigation, the international broadcasting community, represented by technical associations and bodies, has set precise standards aimed to objectively assess loudness levels of programs. Although all standards rely on the same algorithm as described in ITU-R BS1770, there are still two possible ways to implement such metering, including voice detection and gating. These two different implementations might, in some cases, provide measurements that significantly differ from each other. Furthermore, while the gating feature is uniquely defined in the updated version of BS1770-3, voice detection is not currently specified in any standard and its implementation is the independent choice of manufacturers. This paper analyses this scenario by comparing the results and robustness provided by three different loudness meters based on voice detection. In addition, those values are compared with measurements obtained by using BS1770-3 compliant loudness meters, including tables, comments, and conclusions.
@article{travaglini2013comparative,
author={travaglini, alessandro},
journal={journal of the audio engineering society},
title={comparative analysis of different loudness meters based on voice detection and gating},
year={2013},
volume={},
number={},
pages={},
doi={},
month={may},}
@article{travaglini2013comparative,
author={travaglini, alessandro},
journal={journal of the audio engineering society},
title={comparative analysis of different loudness meters based on voice detection and gating},
year={2013},
volume={},
number={},
pages={},
doi={},
month={may},
abstract={after decades of extensive investigation, the international broadcasting community, represented by technical associations and bodies, has set precise standards aimed to objectively assess loudness levels of programs. although all standards rely on the same algorithm as described in itu-r bs1770, there are still two possible ways to implement such metering, including voice detection and gating. these two different implementations might, in some cases, provide measurements that significantly differ from each other. furthermore, while the gating feature is uniquely defined in the updated version of bs1770-3, voice detection is not currently specified in any standard and its implementation is the independent choice of manufacturers. this paper analyses this scenario by comparing the results and robustness provided by three different loudness meters based on voice detection. in addition, those values are compared with measurements obtained by using bs1770-3 compliant loudness meters, including tables, comments, and conclusions.},}
TY - paper
TI - Comparative Analysis of Different Loudness Meters Based on Voice Detection and Gating
SP -
EP -
AU - Travaglini, Alessandro
PY - 2013
JO - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
IS -
VO -
VL -
Y1 - May 2013
TY - paper
TI - Comparative Analysis of Different Loudness Meters Based on Voice Detection and Gating
SP -
EP -
AU - Travaglini, Alessandro
PY - 2013
JO - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
IS -
VO -
VL -
Y1 - May 2013
AB - After decades of extensive investigation, the international broadcasting community, represented by technical associations and bodies, has set precise standards aimed to objectively assess loudness levels of programs. Although all standards rely on the same algorithm as described in ITU-R BS1770, there are still two possible ways to implement such metering, including voice detection and gating. These two different implementations might, in some cases, provide measurements that significantly differ from each other. Furthermore, while the gating feature is uniquely defined in the updated version of BS1770-3, voice detection is not currently specified in any standard and its implementation is the independent choice of manufacturers. This paper analyses this scenario by comparing the results and robustness provided by three different loudness meters based on voice detection. In addition, those values are compared with measurements obtained by using BS1770-3 compliant loudness meters, including tables, comments, and conclusions.
After decades of extensive investigation, the international broadcasting community, represented by technical associations and bodies, has set precise standards aimed to objectively assess loudness levels of programs. Although all standards rely on the same algorithm as described in ITU-R BS1770, there are still two possible ways to implement such metering, including voice detection and gating. These two different implementations might, in some cases, provide measurements that significantly differ from each other. Furthermore, while the gating feature is uniquely defined in the updated version of BS1770-3, voice detection is not currently specified in any standard and its implementation is the independent choice of manufacturers. This paper analyses this scenario by comparing the results and robustness provided by three different loudness meters based on voice detection. In addition, those values are compared with measurements obtained by using BS1770-3 compliant loudness meters, including tables, comments, and conclusions.
Author:
Travaglini, Alessandro
Affiliation:
Fox International Channels Italy, Guidonia Montecelio (RM), Italy
AES Convention:
134 (May 2013)eBrief:86
Publication Date:
May 3, 2013Import into BibTeX
Permalink:
http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=16687
The Engineering Briefs at this Convention were
selected on the basis of a submitted synopsis,
ensuring that they are of interest to AES members,
and are not overly commercial. These briefs have
been reproduced from the authors' advance
manuscripts, without editing, corrections, or
consideration by the Review Board. The AES takes no
responsibility for their contents. Paper copies are
not available, but any member can freely access
these briefs. Members are encouraged to provide
comments that enhance their usefulness.