DU. R.. Begault, MA. R.. Anderson, and MR. U.. Mcclain, "Spatially Modulated Auditory Alerts for Aviation," J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 276-282, (2006 April.). doi:
DU. R.. Begault, MA. R.. Anderson, and MR. U.. Mcclain, "Spatially Modulated Auditory Alerts for Aviation," J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 54 Issue 4 pp. 276-282, (2006 April.). doi:
Abstract: The technique of spatially modulating an existing or newly created auditory alert along a virtual trajectory to improve its detection in a noisy environment is described. Threshold data from 14 participants were gathered as a function of the spatial modulation rate (0, 1.6, and 3.3 Hz) of an avionics “wind sheer” alert (two successive 300-ms square waves) against a steady-state background noise (Boeing 737-300 flight deck ambient sound). The 70.7% detection threshold for the spatially modulated alert was on average 7.8 dB lower than that for an alert without spatial modulation, with noise and signal both presented over headphones using virtual simulation techniques. The threshold for a headphone-delivered spatially modulated alert was 13.4 dB lower than that for a nonmodulated alert delivered over a single loudspeaker.
@article{begault2006spatially,
author={begault, durand r. and anderson, mark r. and mcclain, mryan u.},
journal={journal of the audio engineering society},
title={spatially modulated auditory alerts for aviation},
year={2006},
volume={54},
number={4},
pages={276-282},
doi={},
month={april},}
@article{begault2006spatially,
author={begault, durand r. and anderson, mark r. and mcclain, mryan u.},
journal={journal of the audio engineering society},
title={spatially modulated auditory alerts for aviation},
year={2006},
volume={54},
number={4},
pages={276-282},
doi={},
month={april},
abstract={the technique of spatially modulating an existing or newly created auditory alert along a virtual trajectory to improve its detection in a noisy environment is described. threshold data from 14 participants were gathered as a function of the spatial modulation rate (0, 1.6, and 3.3 hz) of an avionics “wind sheer” alert (two successive 300-ms square waves) against a steady-state background noise (boeing 737-300 flight deck ambient sound). the 70.7% detection threshold for the spatially modulated alert was on average 7.8 db lower than that for an alert without spatial modulation, with noise and signal both presented over headphones using virtual simulation techniques. the threshold for a headphone-delivered spatially modulated alert was 13.4 db lower than that for a nonmodulated alert delivered over a single loudspeaker.},}
TY - paper
TI - Spatially Modulated Auditory Alerts for Aviation
SP - 276
EP - 282
AU - Begault, Durand R.
AU - Anderson, Mark R.
AU - Mcclain, Mryan U.
PY - 2006
JO - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
IS - 4
VO - 54
VL - 54
Y1 - April 2006
TY - paper
TI - Spatially Modulated Auditory Alerts for Aviation
SP - 276
EP - 282
AU - Begault, Durand R.
AU - Anderson, Mark R.
AU - Mcclain, Mryan U.
PY - 2006
JO - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
IS - 4
VO - 54
VL - 54
Y1 - April 2006
AB - The technique of spatially modulating an existing or newly created auditory alert along a virtual trajectory to improve its detection in a noisy environment is described. Threshold data from 14 participants were gathered as a function of the spatial modulation rate (0, 1.6, and 3.3 Hz) of an avionics “wind sheer” alert (two successive 300-ms square waves) against a steady-state background noise (Boeing 737-300 flight deck ambient sound). The 70.7% detection threshold for the spatially modulated alert was on average 7.8 dB lower than that for an alert without spatial modulation, with noise and signal both presented over headphones using virtual simulation techniques. The threshold for a headphone-delivered spatially modulated alert was 13.4 dB lower than that for a nonmodulated alert delivered over a single loudspeaker.
The technique of spatially modulating an existing or newly created auditory alert along a virtual trajectory to improve its detection in a noisy environment is described. Threshold data from 14 participants were gathered as a function of the spatial modulation rate (0, 1.6, and 3.3 Hz) of an avionics “wind sheer” alert (two successive 300-ms square waves) against a steady-state background noise (Boeing 737-300 flight deck ambient sound). The 70.7% detection threshold for the spatially modulated alert was on average 7.8 dB lower than that for an alert without spatial modulation, with noise and signal both presented over headphones using virtual simulation techniques. The threshold for a headphone-delivered spatially modulated alert was 13.4 dB lower than that for a nonmodulated alert delivered over a single loudspeaker.
Authors:
Begault, Durand R.; Anderson, Mark R.; Mcclain, Mryan U.
Affiliation:
NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA JAES Volume 54 Issue 4 pp. 276-282; April 2006
Publication Date:
April 15, 2006Import into BibTeX
Permalink:
http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=13676