A Hybrid Technique for Validating Unidimensionality of Perceived Variation in a Spatial Auditory Stimulus Set
×
Cite This
Citation & Abstract
T. Neher, T. Brookes, and F. Rumsey, "A Hybrid Technique for Validating Unidimensionality of Perceived Variation in a Spatial Auditory Stimulus Set," J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 259-275, (2006 April.). doi:
T. Neher, T. Brookes, and F. Rumsey, "A Hybrid Technique for Validating Unidimensionality of Perceived Variation in a Spatial Auditory Stimulus Set," J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 54 Issue 4 pp. 259-275, (2006 April.). doi:
Abstract: Signal-processing algorithms that are meant to evoke a certain subjective effect often have to be perceptually equalized so that any unwanted artifacts are, as far as possible, eliminated. They can then be said to exhibit “unidimensionality of perceived variation.” Aiming to design a method that allows unidimensionality of perceived variation to be verified, established sensory evaluation approaches are examined in terms of their suitability for detailed, undistorted profiling and hence reliable validation of an algorithm’s subjective effects. It is found that a procedure combining multidimensional scaling with supplementary verbal elicitation constitutes the most appropriate approach. In the context of validating a signal-processing method intended to produce a specific spatial effect, this procedure is evaluated and some shortcomings are identified. However, following refinements, it is concluded that these can be overcome through additional data collection and analysis, resulting in a multistage hybrid validation technique.
@article{neher2006a,
author={neher, tobias and brookes, tim and rumsey, francis},
journal={journal of the audio engineering society},
title={a hybrid technique for validating unidimensionality of perceived variation in a spatial auditory stimulus set},
year={2006},
volume={54},
number={4},
pages={259-275},
doi={},
month={april},}
@article{neher2006a,
author={neher, tobias and brookes, tim and rumsey, francis},
journal={journal of the audio engineering society},
title={a hybrid technique for validating unidimensionality of perceived variation in a spatial auditory stimulus set},
year={2006},
volume={54},
number={4},
pages={259-275},
doi={},
month={april},
abstract={signal-processing algorithms that are meant to evoke a certain subjective effect often have to be perceptually equalized so that any unwanted artifacts are, as far as possible, eliminated. they can then be said to exhibit “unidimensionality of perceived variation.” aiming to design a method that allows unidimensionality of perceived variation to be verified, established sensory evaluation approaches are examined in terms of their suitability for detailed, undistorted profiling and hence reliable validation of an algorithm’s subjective effects. it is found that a procedure combining multidimensional scaling with supplementary verbal elicitation constitutes the most appropriate approach. in the context of validating a signal-processing method intended to produce a specific spatial effect, this procedure is evaluated and some shortcomings are identified. however, following refinements, it is concluded that these can be overcome through additional data collection and analysis, resulting in a multistage hybrid validation technique.},}
TY - paper
TI - A Hybrid Technique for Validating Unidimensionality of Perceived Variation in a Spatial Auditory Stimulus Set
SP - 259
EP - 275
AU - Neher, Tobias
AU - Brookes, Tim
AU - Rumsey, Francis
PY - 2006
JO - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
IS - 4
VO - 54
VL - 54
Y1 - April 2006
TY - paper
TI - A Hybrid Technique for Validating Unidimensionality of Perceived Variation in a Spatial Auditory Stimulus Set
SP - 259
EP - 275
AU - Neher, Tobias
AU - Brookes, Tim
AU - Rumsey, Francis
PY - 2006
JO - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
IS - 4
VO - 54
VL - 54
Y1 - April 2006
AB - Signal-processing algorithms that are meant to evoke a certain subjective effect often have to be perceptually equalized so that any unwanted artifacts are, as far as possible, eliminated. They can then be said to exhibit “unidimensionality of perceived variation.” Aiming to design a method that allows unidimensionality of perceived variation to be verified, established sensory evaluation approaches are examined in terms of their suitability for detailed, undistorted profiling and hence reliable validation of an algorithm’s subjective effects. It is found that a procedure combining multidimensional scaling with supplementary verbal elicitation constitutes the most appropriate approach. In the context of validating a signal-processing method intended to produce a specific spatial effect, this procedure is evaluated and some shortcomings are identified. However, following refinements, it is concluded that these can be overcome through additional data collection and analysis, resulting in a multistage hybrid validation technique.
Signal-processing algorithms that are meant to evoke a certain subjective effect often have to be perceptually equalized so that any unwanted artifacts are, as far as possible, eliminated. They can then be said to exhibit “unidimensionality of perceived variation.” Aiming to design a method that allows unidimensionality of perceived variation to be verified, established sensory evaluation approaches are examined in terms of their suitability for detailed, undistorted profiling and hence reliable validation of an algorithm’s subjective effects. It is found that a procedure combining multidimensional scaling with supplementary verbal elicitation constitutes the most appropriate approach. In the context of validating a signal-processing method intended to produce a specific spatial effect, this procedure is evaluated and some shortcomings are identified. However, following refinements, it is concluded that these can be overcome through additional data collection and analysis, resulting in a multistage hybrid validation technique.
Authors:
Neher, Tobias; Brookes, Tim; Rumsey, Francis
Affiliation:
University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK JAES Volume 54 Issue 4 pp. 259-275; April 2006
Publication Date:
April 15, 2006Import into BibTeX
Permalink:
http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=13675