A comparison between computerized techniques for measuring STI and RASTI is made. The measurements are made under idealized controlled conditions and highlight the differences in results that can occur. The results show that while good agreement between the techniques can be achieved, weighting factors and time windowing can lead to significant errors.
(See document for exact affiliation information.)
Click to purchase paper as a non-member or login as an AES member. If your company or school subscribes to the E-Library then switch to the institutional version. If you are not an AES member Join the AES. If you need to check your member status, login to the Member Portal.
