Journal Forum

Synchronized Swept-Sine: Theory, Application, and Implementation - October 2015

Effect of Microphone Number and Positioning on the Average of Frequency Responses in Cinema Calibration - October 2015
1 comment

The Measurement and Calibration of Sound Reproducing Systems - July 2015

Access Journal Forum

AES E-Library

Loudness Compensation by Microphone Frequency Response and Microphone Placement

Document Thumbnail

Rock bands produce high SPLs when heard live. But recordings of these bands are reproduced at much lower SPLs. Consequently, the reproduction may sound weak in the bass and treble compared to the live band. Some microphones compensate for this loss: they boost the lows with proximity effect (and nearfield placement) and boost the highs with a 'presence peak.' These microphones are often chosen as being the 'best sounding' for recording loud instruments. The author suggests a new specification that quantifies this compensation.

AES Convention: Paper Number:
Publication Date:

Click to purchase paper or login as an AES member. If your company or school subscribes to the E-Library then switch to the institutional version. If you are not an AES member and would like to subscribe to the E-Library then Join the AES!

This paper costs $20 for non-members, $5 for AES members and is free for E-Library subscribers.

Learn more about the AES E-Library

E-Library Location:

Start a discussion about this paper!

Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   Google+   YouTube   RSS News Feeds  
AES - Audio Engineering Society