If well-matched to a given listener, head-related transfer functions (HRTFs) that have not been individually measured can still present relatively effective auditory scenes compared to renderings from individualized HRTF sets. We present and assess a system for HRTF selection that relies on holistic judgments of users to identify their optimal match through a series of pairwise adversarial comparisons. The mechanism resulted in clear preference for a single HRTF set in a majority of cases. Where this did not occur, randomized selection between equally judged HRTFs did not signi?cantly impact user performance in a subsequent listening task. This approach is shown to be equally effective for both novice and expert listeners in selecting their preferred HRTF set.
https://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=19677
Click to purchase paper as a non-member or login as an AES member. If your company or school subscribes to the E-Library then switch to the institutional version. If you are not an AES member and would like to subscribe to the E-Library then Join the AES!
This paper costs $33 for non-members and is free for AES members and E-Library subscribers.
Learn more about the AES E-Library
Start a discussion about this paper!