In This Section
AES Store
- Learn From The Experts:

Frank Laico "Studio Recording"- Oral History Project Gallery
- Other AES Publications
Journal Forum
Virtual Localization by Blind Persons - July 2012
1 comment
Effect of Spatial Location and Presentation Rate on the Reaction to Auditory Displays - July 2012
1 comment
Watermark-Aided Pre-Echo Reduction in Low Bit-Rate Audio Coding - June 2012
1 comment
AES E-Library
Sound Quality Differences between Electret Film (EMFIT) and Piezoelectric Under-saddle Guitar Pickups
Two different types of under-saddle guitar pickups, piezoelectric and electret film (EMFIT) were measured and compared. The measurements included comparisons of magnitude, time, and phase responses, and distortion characteristics. The measurements were conducted with a custom rig that allowed accurate control of the environment. For excitation both frequency sweeps and impulsive stimuli were used. As for the magnitude response, the piezoelectric pickup has a boosted bass response and a slightly pronounced high frequency response. The results imply nonlinear behaviour as a function of both the excitation type (sweep vs. impulsive) and the amount of excitation force (small vs. large). In addition, the piezoelectric microphone is fairly immune to tension changes, whereas EMFIT microphone's sensitivity increases as the tension decreases. For time responses excited impulsively the only differences were found at the beginning of the responses. No significant difference in the distortion behaviour was found. A linear filter model is also proposed for making either microphone sound like the other.
Click to purchase paper or login as an AES member. If your company or school subscribes to the E-Library then switch to the institutional version. If you are not an AES member and would like to subscribe to the E-Library then Join the AES!
This paper costs $20 for non-members, $5 for AES members and is free for E-Library subscribers.
Learn more about the AES E-Library
Start a discussion about this paper!






