The Evolution and Design of Flat-Panel Loudspeakers for Audio Reproduction
×
Cite This
Citation & Abstract
MI. C.. Heilemann, DA. A.. Anderson, S. Roessner, and MA. F.. Bocko, "The Evolution and Design of Flat-Panel Loudspeakers for Audio Reproduction," J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 69, no. 1/2, pp. 27-39, (2021 January.). doi: https://doi.org/10.17743/jaes.2020.0057
MI. C.. Heilemann, DA. A.. Anderson, S. Roessner, and MA. F.. Bocko, "The Evolution and Design of Flat-Panel Loudspeakers for Audio Reproduction," J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 69 Issue 1/2 pp. 27-39, (2021 January.). doi: https://doi.org/10.17743/jaes.2020.0057
Abstract: The underlying physics and the design of loudspeakers that radiate sound through the bending vibrations of elastic panels, here referred to generically as flat-panel loudspeakers, are reviewed in this paper. The form factor, reduced weight, and aesthetic appeal of flat-panel speakers have made them a topic of interest for more than 90 years, but these advantages have been overshadowed by acoustical shortcomings, specifically the uneven frequency response and directivity in comparison to conventional cone-radiator loudspeakers. Fundamentally, the design challenges of flat-panel speakers arise from the intrinsically large number of mechanical degrees of freedom of a panel radiator. A number of methods have been explored to compensate for the acoustical shortcomings of flat-panel speakers, such as employing inverse filters, equalization, canceling mechanical resonances with actuator arrays, and modifying the panel material, shape, structure, and boundary conditions. Such methods have been used in various combinations to achieve significant audio performance improvements, and carefully designed flat-panel loudspeakers have been rated in blind listening tests as competitive with some prosumer-grade conventional loudspeakers. This review presents a brief historical account of the evolution of flat-panel loudspeakers and summarizes the essential physics and design methodologies that have been developed to optimize their fidelity and directional response.
@article{heilemann2021the,
author={heilemann, michael c. and anderson, david a. and roessner, stephen and bocko, mark f.},
journal={journal of the audio engineering society},
title={the evolution and design of flat-panel loudspeakers for audio reproduction},
year={2021},
volume={69},
number={1/2},
pages={27-39},
doi={https://doi.org/10.17743/jaes.2020.0057},
month={january},}
@article{heilemann2021the,
author={heilemann, michael c. and anderson, david a. and roessner, stephen and bocko, mark f.},
journal={journal of the audio engineering society},
title={the evolution and design of flat-panel loudspeakers for audio reproduction},
year={2021},
volume={69},
number={1/2},
pages={27-39},
doi={https://doi.org/10.17743/jaes.2020.0057},
month={january},
abstract={the underlying physics and the design of loudspeakers that radiate sound through the bending vibrations of elastic panels, here referred to generically as flat-panel loudspeakers, are reviewed in this paper. the form factor, reduced weight, and aesthetic appeal of flat-panel speakers have made them a topic of interest for more than 90 years, but these advantages have been overshadowed by acoustical shortcomings, specifically the uneven frequency response and directivity in comparison to conventional cone-radiator loudspeakers. fundamentally, the design challenges of flat-panel speakers arise from the intrinsically large number of mechanical degrees of freedom of a panel radiator. a number of methods have been explored to compensate for the acoustical shortcomings of flat-panel speakers, such as employing inverse filters, equalization, canceling mechanical resonances with actuator arrays, and modifying the panel material, shape, structure, and boundary conditions. such methods have been used in various combinations to achieve significant audio performance improvements, and carefully designed flat-panel loudspeakers have been rated in blind listening tests as competitive with some prosumer-grade conventional loudspeakers. this review presents a brief historical account of the evolution of flat-panel loudspeakers and summarizes the essential physics and design methodologies that have been developed to optimize their fidelity and directional response.},}
TY - paper
TI - The Evolution and Design of Flat-Panel Loudspeakers for Audio Reproduction
SP - 27
EP - 39
AU - Heilemann, Michael C.
AU - Anderson, David A.
AU - Roessner, Stephen
AU - Bocko, Mark F.
PY - 2021
JO - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
IS - 1/2
VO - 69
VL - 69
Y1 - January 2021
TY - paper
TI - The Evolution and Design of Flat-Panel Loudspeakers for Audio Reproduction
SP - 27
EP - 39
AU - Heilemann, Michael C.
AU - Anderson, David A.
AU - Roessner, Stephen
AU - Bocko, Mark F.
PY - 2021
JO - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
IS - 1/2
VO - 69
VL - 69
Y1 - January 2021
AB - The underlying physics and the design of loudspeakers that radiate sound through the bending vibrations of elastic panels, here referred to generically as flat-panel loudspeakers, are reviewed in this paper. The form factor, reduced weight, and aesthetic appeal of flat-panel speakers have made them a topic of interest for more than 90 years, but these advantages have been overshadowed by acoustical shortcomings, specifically the uneven frequency response and directivity in comparison to conventional cone-radiator loudspeakers. Fundamentally, the design challenges of flat-panel speakers arise from the intrinsically large number of mechanical degrees of freedom of a panel radiator. A number of methods have been explored to compensate for the acoustical shortcomings of flat-panel speakers, such as employing inverse filters, equalization, canceling mechanical resonances with actuator arrays, and modifying the panel material, shape, structure, and boundary conditions. Such methods have been used in various combinations to achieve significant audio performance improvements, and carefully designed flat-panel loudspeakers have been rated in blind listening tests as competitive with some prosumer-grade conventional loudspeakers. This review presents a brief historical account of the evolution of flat-panel loudspeakers and summarizes the essential physics and design methodologies that have been developed to optimize their fidelity and directional response.
The underlying physics and the design of loudspeakers that radiate sound through the bending vibrations of elastic panels, here referred to generically as flat-panel loudspeakers, are reviewed in this paper. The form factor, reduced weight, and aesthetic appeal of flat-panel speakers have made them a topic of interest for more than 90 years, but these advantages have been overshadowed by acoustical shortcomings, specifically the uneven frequency response and directivity in comparison to conventional cone-radiator loudspeakers. Fundamentally, the design challenges of flat-panel speakers arise from the intrinsically large number of mechanical degrees of freedom of a panel radiator. A number of methods have been explored to compensate for the acoustical shortcomings of flat-panel speakers, such as employing inverse filters, equalization, canceling mechanical resonances with actuator arrays, and modifying the panel material, shape, structure, and boundary conditions. Such methods have been used in various combinations to achieve significant audio performance improvements, and carefully designed flat-panel loudspeakers have been rated in blind listening tests as competitive with some prosumer-grade conventional loudspeakers. This review presents a brief historical account of the evolution of flat-panel loudspeakers and summarizes the essential physics and design methodologies that have been developed to optimize their fidelity and directional response.
Authors:
Heilemann, Michael C.; Anderson, David A.; Roessner, Stephen; Bocko, Mark F.
Affiliations:
University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA; Applied Research Associates, Inc., Littleton, CO, USA; University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA; Applied Research Associates, Inc., Littleton, CO, USA(See document for exact affiliation information.) JAES Volume 69 Issue 1/2 pp. 27-39; January 2021
Publication Date:
February 19, 2021Import into BibTeX
Permalink:
http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=21014