AES E-Library

B. Cuyx, W. Desmet, W. Buyens, and T. van Waterschoot, "Design and validation of a low-cost acoustic anechoic chamber," Engineering Brief 627, (2020 October.). doi: B. Cuyx, W. Desmet, W. Buyens, and T. van Waterschoot, "Design and validation of a low-cost acoustic anechoic chamber," Engineering Brief 627, (2020 October.). doi:
Abstract: This engineering brief describes the design, construction and validation of a low-cost acoustic anechoic chamber. This anechoic chamber will be used in a production setting as well as for research and development of a microphone array system. Three chambers have been built using the same method. The performance of the rooms is evaluated in terms of sound isolation, deviation from inverse square law, frequency response function and reverberation time. Results show that in the frequency range of interest (250 - 11025 Hz), the reverberation time for the three chambers is 19 ± 3 ms. The difference between the frequency response of the chambers is ± 4 dB in the frequency range of interest for the two latest built chambers, whereas the ?rst chamber shows a larger deviation.

@article{cuyx2020design,
author={cuyx, bram and desmet, wim and buyens, wim and van waterschoot, toon},
journal={journal of the audio engineering society},
title={design and validation of a low-cost acoustic anechoic chamber},
year={2020},
volume={},
number={},
pages={},
doi={},
month={october},} @article{cuyx2020design,
author={cuyx, bram and desmet, wim and buyens, wim and van waterschoot, toon},
journal={journal of the audio engineering society},
title={design and validation of a low-cost acoustic anechoic chamber},
year={2020},
volume={},
number={},
pages={},
doi={},
month={october},
abstract={this engineering brief describes the design, construction and validation of a low-cost acoustic anechoic chamber. this anechoic chamber will be used in a production setting as well as for research and development of a microphone array system. three chambers have been built using the same method. the performance of the rooms is evaluated in terms of sound isolation, deviation from inverse square law, frequency response function and reverberation time. results show that in the frequency range of interest (250 - 11025 hz), the reverberation time for the three chambers is 19 ± 3 ms. the difference between the frequency response of the chambers is ± 4 db in the frequency range of interest for the two latest built chambers, whereas the ?rst chamber shows a larger deviation.},}

TY - paper
TI - Design and validation of a low-cost acoustic anechoic chamber
SP - EP -
AU - Cuyx, Bram
AU - Desmet, Wim
AU - Buyens, Wim
AU - van Waterschoot, Toon
PY - 2020
JO - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
IS -
VO -
VL -
Y1 - October 2020 TY - paper
TI - Design and validation of a low-cost acoustic anechoic chamber
SP - EP -
AU - Cuyx, Bram
AU - Desmet, Wim
AU - Buyens, Wim
AU - van Waterschoot, Toon
PY - 2020
JO - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
IS -
VO -
VL -
Y1 - October 2020
AB - This engineering brief describes the design, construction and validation of a low-cost acoustic anechoic chamber. This anechoic chamber will be used in a production setting as well as for research and development of a microphone array system. Three chambers have been built using the same method. The performance of the rooms is evaluated in terms of sound isolation, deviation from inverse square law, frequency response function and reverberation time. Results show that in the frequency range of interest (250 - 11025 Hz), the reverberation time for the three chambers is 19 ± 3 ms. The difference between the frequency response of the chambers is ± 4 dB in the frequency range of interest for the two latest built chambers, whereas the ?rst chamber shows a larger deviation.