Investigation into the Effects of Subjective Test Interface Choice on the Validity of Results
×
Cite This
Citation & Abstract
N. Jillings, B. De Man, R. Stables, and JO. D.. Reiss, "Investigation into the Effects of Subjective Test Interface Choice on the Validity of Results," Paper 10034, (2018 October.). doi:
N. Jillings, B. De Man, R. Stables, and JO. D.. Reiss, "Investigation into the Effects of Subjective Test Interface Choice on the Validity of Results," Paper 10034, (2018 October.). doi:
Abstract: Subjective experiments are a cornerstone of modern research with a variety of tasks being undertaken by subjects. In the field of audio, subjective listening tests provide validation for research and aid fair comparison between techniques or devices such as coding performance, speakers, mixes, and source separation systems. Several interfaces have been designed to mitigate biases and to standardize procedures, enabling indirect comparisons. The number of different combinations of interface and test design make it extremely difficult to conduct a truly unbiased listening test. This paper resolves the largest of these variables by identifying the impact the interface itself has on a purely auditory test. This information is used to make recommendations for specific categories of listening tests.
@article{jillings2018investigation,
author={jillings, nicholas and de man, brecht and stables, ryan and reiss, joshua d.},
journal={journal of the audio engineering society},
title={investigation into the effects of subjective test interface choice on the validity of results},
year={2018},
volume={},
number={},
pages={},
doi={},
month={october},}
@article{jillings2018investigation,
author={jillings, nicholas and de man, brecht and stables, ryan and reiss, joshua d.},
journal={journal of the audio engineering society},
title={investigation into the effects of subjective test interface choice on the validity of results},
year={2018},
volume={},
number={},
pages={},
doi={},
month={october},
abstract={subjective experiments are a cornerstone of modern research with a variety of tasks being undertaken by subjects. in the field of audio, subjective listening tests provide validation for research and aid fair comparison between techniques or devices such as coding performance, speakers, mixes, and source separation systems. several interfaces have been designed to mitigate biases and to standardize procedures, enabling indirect comparisons. the number of different combinations of interface and test design make it extremely difficult to conduct a truly unbiased listening test. this paper resolves the largest of these variables by identifying the impact the interface itself has on a purely auditory test. this information is used to make recommendations for specific categories of listening tests.},}
TY - paper
TI - Investigation into the Effects of Subjective Test Interface Choice on the Validity of Results
SP -
EP -
AU - Jillings, Nicholas
AU - De Man, Brecht
AU - Stables, Ryan
AU - Reiss, Joshua D.
PY - 2018
JO - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
IS -
VO -
VL -
Y1 - October 2018
TY - paper
TI - Investigation into the Effects of Subjective Test Interface Choice on the Validity of Results
SP -
EP -
AU - Jillings, Nicholas
AU - De Man, Brecht
AU - Stables, Ryan
AU - Reiss, Joshua D.
PY - 2018
JO - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
IS -
VO -
VL -
Y1 - October 2018
AB - Subjective experiments are a cornerstone of modern research with a variety of tasks being undertaken by subjects. In the field of audio, subjective listening tests provide validation for research and aid fair comparison between techniques or devices such as coding performance, speakers, mixes, and source separation systems. Several interfaces have been designed to mitigate biases and to standardize procedures, enabling indirect comparisons. The number of different combinations of interface and test design make it extremely difficult to conduct a truly unbiased listening test. This paper resolves the largest of these variables by identifying the impact the interface itself has on a purely auditory test. This information is used to make recommendations for specific categories of listening tests.
Subjective experiments are a cornerstone of modern research with a variety of tasks being undertaken by subjects. In the field of audio, subjective listening tests provide validation for research and aid fair comparison between techniques or devices such as coding performance, speakers, mixes, and source separation systems. Several interfaces have been designed to mitigate biases and to standardize procedures, enabling indirect comparisons. The number of different combinations of interface and test design make it extremely difficult to conduct a truly unbiased listening test. This paper resolves the largest of these variables by identifying the impact the interface itself has on a purely auditory test. This information is used to make recommendations for specific categories of listening tests.
Authors:
Jillings, Nicholas; De Man, Brecht; Stables, Ryan; Reiss, Joshua D.
Affiliations:
Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK; Queen Mary University of London, London, UK(See document for exact affiliation information.)
AES Convention:
145 (October 2018)
Paper Number:
10034
Publication Date:
October 7, 2018Import into BibTeX
Subject:
Perception – Part 1
Permalink:
http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=19760