A multi-phase subjective experiment evaluating six commercially available binaural audio renderers was carried out. This paper presents the methodology, evaluation criteria, and main ?ndings of the tests that assessed perceived sound quality of the renderers. Subjects appraised a number of speci?c sound quality attributes—timbral balance, clarity, naturalness, spaciousness, and dialogue intelligibility—and ranked, in terms of preference, the renderers for a set of music and movie stimuli presented over headphones. Results indicated that differences between the perceived quality and preference for a renderer are discernible. Binaural renderer performance was also found to be highly content-dependent, with signi?cant interactions between renderers and individual stimuli being found, making it dif?cult to determine an “optimal” renderer for all settings.

Authors: Reardon, Gregory; Genovese, Andrea; Zalles, Gabriel; Flanagan, Patrick; Roginska, Agnieszka
Affiliations: New York University, New York, NY, USA; THX, San Francisco, CA, USA(See document for exact affiliation information.)
AES Conference: 2018 AES International Conference on Audio for Virtual and Augmented Reality (August 2018)
Paper Number: P2-5
Publication Date: August 11, 2018 Import into BibTeX
Permalink: http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=19694

Click to purchase paper as a non-member or login as an AES member. If your company or school subscribes to the E-Library then switch to the institutional version. If you are not an AES member and would like to subscribe to the E-Library then Join the AES!

This paper costs $33 for non-members and is free for AES members and E-Library subscribers.

Learn more about the AES E-Library

E-Library Location:   /conf/2018/avar/2018_avar_paper_58.pdf

Start a discussion about this paper!