Nearfield Crosstalk Increases Listener Preferences for Headphone-Reproduced Stereophonic Imagery
×
Cite This
Citation & Abstract
E. Manor, W. Martens, A. Marui, and D. Cabrera, "Nearfield Crosstalk Increases Listener Preferences for Headphone-Reproduced Stereophonic Imagery," J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 324-335, (2015 May.). doi: https://doi.org/10.17743/jaes.2015.0022
E. Manor, W. Martens, A. Marui, and D. Cabrera, "Nearfield Crosstalk Increases Listener Preferences for Headphone-Reproduced Stereophonic Imagery," J. Audio Eng. Soc., vol. 63 Issue 5 pp. 324-335, (2015 May.). doi: https://doi.org/10.17743/jaes.2015.0022
Abstract: Although final mixing and mastering is monitored over loudspeakers, the majority of music listeners use headphones on mobile devices. Preferences for spatial process depend on the method of reproduction. For a variety of program material using headphones, listeners often prefer a stereophonic image that is created by simulating nearfield crosstalk compared to the biphonic spatial image. This novel approach, called Nearfield Crosstalk Simulation, describes crosstalk that simulates closely located loudspeakers. Previous work used farfield crosstalk simulation in an effort to produce an enhanced stereophonic effect, but such results were less preferred. The primary difference between the more conventional farfield crosstalk and the novel nearfield crosstalk developed for this study was the introduction of a level and a time difference at low frequency, consistent with what actually occurs for sound sources very close to a listener’s head.
@article{manor2015nearfield,
author={manor, ella and martens, william and marui, atsushi and cabrera, densil},
journal={journal of the audio engineering society},
title={nearfield crosstalk increases listener preferences for headphone-reproduced stereophonic imagery},
year={2015},
volume={63},
number={5},
pages={324-335},
doi={https://doi.org/10.17743/jaes.2015.0022},
month={may},}
@article{manor2015nearfield,
author={manor, ella and martens, william and marui, atsushi and cabrera, densil},
journal={journal of the audio engineering society},
title={nearfield crosstalk increases listener preferences for headphone-reproduced stereophonic imagery},
year={2015},
volume={63},
number={5},
pages={324-335},
doi={https://doi.org/10.17743/jaes.2015.0022},
month={may},
abstract={although final mixing and mastering is monitored over loudspeakers, the majority of music listeners use headphones on mobile devices. preferences for spatial process depend on the method of reproduction. for a variety of program material using headphones, listeners often prefer a stereophonic image that is created by simulating nearfield crosstalk compared to the biphonic spatial image. this novel approach, called nearfield crosstalk simulation, describes crosstalk that simulates closely located loudspeakers. previous work used farfield crosstalk simulation in an effort to produce an enhanced stereophonic effect, but such results were less preferred. the primary difference between the more conventional farfield crosstalk and the novel nearfield crosstalk developed for this study was the introduction of a level and a time difference at low frequency, consistent with what actually occurs for sound sources very close to a listener’s head.},}
TY - paper
TI - Nearfield Crosstalk Increases Listener Preferences for Headphone-Reproduced Stereophonic Imagery
SP - 324
EP - 335
AU - Manor, Ella
AU - Martens, William
AU - Marui, Atsushi
AU - Cabrera, Densil
PY - 2015
JO - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
IS - 5
VO - 63
VL - 63
Y1 - May 2015
TY - paper
TI - Nearfield Crosstalk Increases Listener Preferences for Headphone-Reproduced Stereophonic Imagery
SP - 324
EP - 335
AU - Manor, Ella
AU - Martens, William
AU - Marui, Atsushi
AU - Cabrera, Densil
PY - 2015
JO - Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
IS - 5
VO - 63
VL - 63
Y1 - May 2015
AB - Although final mixing and mastering is monitored over loudspeakers, the majority of music listeners use headphones on mobile devices. Preferences for spatial process depend on the method of reproduction. For a variety of program material using headphones, listeners often prefer a stereophonic image that is created by simulating nearfield crosstalk compared to the biphonic spatial image. This novel approach, called Nearfield Crosstalk Simulation, describes crosstalk that simulates closely located loudspeakers. Previous work used farfield crosstalk simulation in an effort to produce an enhanced stereophonic effect, but such results were less preferred. The primary difference between the more conventional farfield crosstalk and the novel nearfield crosstalk developed for this study was the introduction of a level and a time difference at low frequency, consistent with what actually occurs for sound sources very close to a listener’s head.
Although final mixing and mastering is monitored over loudspeakers, the majority of music listeners use headphones on mobile devices. Preferences for spatial process depend on the method of reproduction. For a variety of program material using headphones, listeners often prefer a stereophonic image that is created by simulating nearfield crosstalk compared to the biphonic spatial image. This novel approach, called Nearfield Crosstalk Simulation, describes crosstalk that simulates closely located loudspeakers. Previous work used farfield crosstalk simulation in an effort to produce an enhanced stereophonic effect, but such results were less preferred. The primary difference between the more conventional farfield crosstalk and the novel nearfield crosstalk developed for this study was the introduction of a level and a time difference at low frequency, consistent with what actually occurs for sound sources very close to a listener’s head.
Authors:
Manor, Ella; Martens, William; Marui, Atsushi; Cabrera, Densil
Affiliations:
University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Tokyo University of the Arts, Adachi-ku, Tokyo, Japan(See document for exact affiliation information.) JAES Volume 63 Issue 5 pp. 324-335; May 2015
Publication Date:
May 22, 2015Import into BibTeX
Permalink:
http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=17638