The sensitivity of five audio distortion measurement methods has been investigated with experimental measurements of circuits simulating basic archetypal distortion mechanisms. The results show that the ordinary measurement methods, THD, and SMPTE-IM, do not reveal dynamic distortions, and that every method has unacceptably low sensitivity for at least one distortion mechanism. The combined use of the DIM method and the CCIF-IM method for a complete specification of amplifier distortion is recommended, because their "blind" spots do not overlap. Distortion measurements of eleven commercial power amplifiers and eleven operational amplifiers show a mixture of the archetypal distortion mechanism, mostly dynamic distortions for the operational amplifiers, and mixed static and dynamic distortions for the power amplifiers. The results obtained with the different methods have been found to correlate qualitatively but not quantitatively for each type of nonlinearity separately. In a mixed case and for commercial amplifiers the qualitative correlation disappears, and there seems to be no reliable way of predicting the measurement result of one method from that of another method in the case of an unknown amplifier.
https://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=3132
Click to purchase paper as a non-member or login as an AES member. If your company or school subscribes to the E-Library then switch to the institutional version. If you are not an AES member and would like to subscribe to the E-Library then Join the AES!
This paper costs $33 for non-members and is free for AES members and E-Library subscribers.
Learn more about the AES E-Library
Start a discussion about this paper!
