One of the main elements of the research in acoustics of crime is to compare the evidential recording with the comparative adequate pattern. Unfortunately, the evidential recording usually has poor quality and contains relatively high level of noise, which results from the way of its acquiring, namely eavesdropping or record of automatic monitoring. The signal quality and the noise to signal ratio have an impact on the value of the extracted voice metrics. In this paper we analyze factors that may have an impact on formants value in the human voice. Based on Six Sigma methodology we also designed and performed an experiment that allowed us to determine the extent in which various factors influence on the resulting parameters.
https://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=17757
Click to purchase paper as a non-member or login as an AES member. If your company or school subscribes to the E-Library then switch to the institutional version. If you are not an AES member and would like to subscribe to the E-Library then Join the AES!
This paper costs $33 for non-members and is free for AES members and E-Library subscribers.
Learn more about the AES E-Library
Start a discussion about this paper!
