Evaluating the quality of voice recordings invokes two different aspects of preference: the appeal of the speaker’s voice characteristics and the perceived degradation of the actual recording. Subjective experiments where no reference ideal is provided, called absolute category ratings, fuse together both components. This research investigates if voice postprocessing (timbre optimization, loudness compensations, de-essing, room reverberation, and noise suppression) can improve perceived quality. The results show that none of these processing methods significantly improve the perceived quality and mostly give rise to a quality degradation. The voice preference is a very significant factor in the perceived quality. The subjective results are used to validate ITU-T Recommendation P.863 (POLQA) in the high quality region.

Authors: Beerends, John; Beerends, Imre
Affiliations: TNO, The Hague, The Netherlands; Mantis Audio, Wateringen, The Netherlands(See document for exact affiliation information.)
JAES Volume 63 Issue 3 pp. 174-183; March 2015
Publication Date: March 16, 2015 Import into BibTeX
Permalink: https://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=17576

Click to purchase paper as a non-member or login as an AES member. If your company or school subscribes to the E-Library then switch to the institutional version. If you are not an AES member and would like to subscribe to the E-Library then Join the AES!

This paper costs $33 for non-members and is free for AES members and E-Library subscribers.

Learn more about the AES E-Library

E-Library Location: (CD JAES63)   /jaes63/3/pg174.pdf

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17743/jaes.2015.0013

Start a discussion about this report!