Current research into spatial audio has shown an increasing interest in the way subjective attributes of reproduced sound are elicited from listeners. The emphasis at present is on verbal semantics, however, studies suggest that nonverbal methods of elicitation could be beneficial. Research into the relative merits of these methods has found that nonverbal responses may result in different elicited attributes compared to verbal techniques. Nonverbal responses may be closer to the perception of the stimuli than the verbal interpretation of this perception. There is evidence that drawing is not as accurate as other nonverbal methods of elicitation when it comes to reporting the localization of auditory images. However, the advantage of drawing is its ability to describe the whole auditory space rather than a single dimension.

Authors: Mason, Russell; Ford, Natanya; Rumsey, Francis; De Bruyn, Bart
Affiliation: Institute of Sound Recording and Department of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK
JAES Volume 49 Issue 5 pp. 366-384; May 2001
Publication Date: May 1, 2001 Import into BibTeX
Permalink: https://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=10190

Click to purchase paper as a non-member or login as an AES member. If your company or school subscribes to the E-Library then switch to the institutional version. If you are not an AES member and would like to subscribe to the E-Library then Join the AES!

This paper costs $33 for non-members and is free for AES members and E-Library subscribers.

Learn more about the AES E-Library

E-Library Location: (CD aes18)   /jrnl2001/2001/2001366.pdf

Start a discussion about this paper!